Did Pedro de Unamuno Really Land in Morro Bay in 1587?  I Think Not!

For submission to Nature Notes -- Mike Baird
Few of us question the validity of reported key events in Morro Bay's history:

So, in 1587, 45 years after Juan Cabrillo sighted Morro Rock (but did not enter Morro Bay due to the treacherous environment), this Pedro Unamuno fellow is reported to have simply landed on a beach here and gone about his business of "fending off native Indian attacks from a nearby hillside."  There seems to be little public doubt about this -- and there is even a plaque posted at Coleman Park in Morro Bay, commemorating this landing.  

The thesis of this article is that Unamuno's  reported landing did not occur in Morro Bay.  The "Puerto de San Lucas" that Unamuno discovered would not appear in nautical charts -- and it almost surely was not present day Morro Bay.  However, it well could have been near near Avila 15 miles to the south.

The remainder of this article is based largely on an account by historian Hector Santos (Ref.)  -- published at http://www.bibingka.com/sst/esperanza/morrobay.htm

The popular conclusion that Pedro de Unamuno landed in Morro Bay is based almost entirely on 1929 conclusions by one Henry R. Wagner (Ref.).    Wagner presumably knew about the topography of Morro Bay, Morro Rock, the sand spit as it existed in 1929, and the harbor's difficult entrance at the time... but chose to ignore the lack of any mention of these features by Unamuno.  Instead, Wagner relied as his main evidence the computation of the latitude by the ship’s pilot, Alonso Gomez.  Unamuno said, “While thus anchored, about two harquebus-shots off the beach, we observed the sun between eleven and twelve o’clock noon, and found the port to be in full 35½º.” Morro Bay happens to be at latitude 35º 22', almost exactly what Unamuno reported.  We should note that the accuracy of mechanical astrolabes used in the 16th century leaves a lot to be desired.

Here is a photo astrolabes.org.jpg (45499 bytes) of a typical primitive astrolabe of the day.  These are hardly devices worthy of computing latitude to a fraction of a degree.  Unamuno stated that they made their observation between 11:00 am and 12:00 noon. It was not a more accurate night observation of  the north star Polaris.  It was also not made exactly at noon and would have required the interpolation of values in their charts, adding to errors already built in. 

Wagner actually suspected  that Unamuno might have landed in Avila's San Luis Bay 15 miles to the south, but dismissed that possibility... preferring instead to reply solely on the latitude computation.  Unamuno probably made his way to the vicinity of present day San Luis Obispo.  And, there is some evidence that the Indians in San Luis Obispo Bay displayed an acquaintance with Mexicans eight years later... supporting an argument that Unamuno landed there instead.

Here is an expansion of the arguments suggesting that the Unamuno landing never occurred at present day Morro Bay:

Firstly, no mention was ever made of the existence of Morro Rock.  Obviously, Morro Rock existed in 1587, and it would have been hard to miss during a two-day stay.  How could anyone have made such an historic landing, lasting several days, and not have mentioned Morro Rock?  Trying to rationalize their account... did they perhaps land on the beach north of the Rock in Estero Bay (where there are no hillsides near the coast ,as chronicled); or, did they enter the nascent Morro Bay harbor, where there was no "beach" per se (only mudflats, salt marsh, and an outer sand spit), navigating the then shallow channels and treacherous currents (and not mention such a configuration?). 

Secondly, Unamuno made no mention of the presence of a sand spit.   Wagner, who translated and interpreted Unamuno's handwritten journal, personally believed that the sand spit did not exist in 1587 and that the bay was wide open at the time.  We know today that the sand spit existed in 1587.  Archeological data chronicle native sites on its northern end of the sand spit, dating to 4000 years ago."  Here is a map of the Morro Bay area as envisioned 3000 - 5500 years ago , and the sand spit is shown to exist even back then.  (from http://www.farwestern.com/morrobay/morro.htm ).   Portola recognized the sand spit in his reports from 1769 (although there is some controversy as to whether or not  the south end of the bay -- Shark Inlet -- might not have been open to the sea at that time).

It appears that Wagner simply chose to "reason away" vast conflicting topological evidence in favor of one inaccurate latitude measurement.

Here is a topographical map of Morro Bay from 1897 300dpi_plus51b_plus18c_638x814gl_20pc.jpg (53954 bytes) (view smaller 638x814 map; print larger 2550x3255 map). where the sand spit continues to assume its basic form enclosing the bay.

There are many photos of the Morro Bay harbor from around 1900 (well before the Rock was connected to the mainland, and the channel dredged) (e.g., see http://morro-bay.com/photos-maps/ ).  The description of a simple "beach" landing (with no mention from Unamuno of the Morro Rock, the harbor mudflats, the harbor salt marsh, the harbor entry surf and currents, the all-encompassing sand spit...) does not seem at all consistent with what we know about Morro Bay harbor from 100 years ago.  

A third weaker argument is that It was stated that the Unamuno party camped for the night under great oak trees near a river.  This is possible, but not highly likely near Morro Bay.  Of the several small creeks entering, or near, Morro Bay (Morro Creek, Chorro Creek, and Los Osos Creek furthest to the south), the first two of these creeks do not harbor great oak trees today.  We know that the general area of Morro Bay was almost treeless before Franklin Riley promoted them in the new settlement in 1864.  The Avila Beach, Port San Luis area 15 miles to the south, however, possibly harbors a more sizeable river with correspondingly larger surrounding giant oak trees.

So, why do we think that Pedro de Unamuno landed in Morro Bay in 1587?

Pedro Unamuno's claim is reflected in the text of a plaque, which is located off Coleman Drive, near the corner of Embarcadero Road, in Coleman Park next to the playground.  Here is a map to its location.  Here is a photo of the plaque, and a transcription of what it says:

Historic Site

During the Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade era from 1565 to 1815 Spanish galleons crossed the pacific between the Philippines and Mexico. On October 18, 1587, the Manila Galleon Nuestra Senora de Esperanza commanded by Pedro de Unamuno entered Morro Bay near here. A landing party was sent to shore which included Luzon Indios, marking the first landing of Filipinos in the continental United States. The landing party took official possession of the area for Spain by putting up a cross made of branches. The group was attacked by native Indians two days later, and one of the Filipinos was killed. Unamuno and his crew gave up further exploration of this part of the coast.

Historical Landmark Declared by the
Filipino American National Historical Society
California Central Coast Chapter
Dedicated October 21, 1995

Unamuno's 1587 landing is briefly chronicled by the Filipino American National Historical Society (Ref.), and the Amerasia Journal  (Ref.) reports the landing in substantial detail:

Here is a 1900 Map of California, (showing that the town of Morro Bay was called simply "Morro,") and illustrating where a more likely landing site could have been, such as in Port Harford (now called Port San Luis near Avila Beach) about 15 miles to the south.

The Filipino community (see Americans of Filipino Descent 
http://personal.anderson.ucla.edu/eloisa.borah/filfaqs.htm#history and
http://personal.anderson.ucla.edu/eloisa.borah/chronology.pdf ) is rightfully proud to want to document Unamuno's reported landing, in which Luzones Indios appear to have been the first explorers to have landed in Central California in 1587.  Whether or not that landing was in Morro Bay is open to interpretation.  Let's indeed celebrate the landing -- but let's also do our best to pinpoint its most likely location (which most likely was not Morro Bay).

The truth may never be known.  More historical information about Morro Bay can be found at http://morro-bay.com/historical/  


References:

This page is published at http://morro-bay.com/docents/mike-baird/nature-notes/unamuno-1587/ and contains hyperlinks to more information.  Here are some of the embedded hyperlinks.

morro-bay.com Revised Monday, February 18, 2008 01:24:24 PM